I recently posted a link to an article about raising animals for meat. The comments posted below the article are very much divided. Many people state that it is morally reprehensible to kill animals for food yet we know that animals are an important component of diversified, healthy agricultural systems. The questions of stress and suffering are valid when we are looking to give animals the most humane treatment possible, while there is a real disconnect for the public on both sides with what it means to kill to eat. How we reflect our own feelings about suffering and death is part of our moral compass. However, we are so far removed in our industrial and technological society that we may no longer see the benefit or necessity of this part of our nature. This is one of the questions raised by the farmer in the article. How do we justify killing as our moral compass shifts?
Nature, Morality, and Death